Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

The Inefficiency of the Ecpr Yet Again

Patient Selection

The use of extracorporeal back up afterwards failed return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is well described in children and in adults (1–xviii). The utility of ECPR has been demonstrated in single center and registry retrospective studies. The about recently published registry data from 2011 to 2015 from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), reported a survival to belch using ECPR of forty% in neonatal and pediatric populations (4). The survival subsequently ECPR is lower in the developed population reported at 28%, and while this may reflect different characteristics of the patients selected for ECPR such as predominantly having ischemic centre disease, there may exist systems issues that impact outcomes and the timely use of ECPR (e.thousand., out-of-hospital location).

ECPR for refractory cardiopulmonary abort tin can be applied for the purpose of supporting a patient for cerebral-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cerebral-CPR) (nineteen) or for the purpose of supporting organs for donation (20). This paper focuses on using ECPR for cerebral-CPR. In this context, ECMO engineering science is generally applied for the purpose of (one) span-to-recovery by providing time for diagnostic procedures and/or therapeutics to be delivered (due east.thou., acute arrhythmia following cardiac surgery, or from electrolyte disturbance with loss of cardiac output and refractory to conventional therapy, acute myocarditis with complex arrhythmias or eye block, patient with residuum lesions subsequently cardiac surgery who could undergo boosted surgery or intervention in the catheterization laboratory); (two) bridge-to-organ transplantation or as a means to bridging to determination with another device—to consider organ transplantation; or for (3) bridge-to-decision, which includes conclusion to continue, decision to stop advanced technological support, and to bridge to palliative care plan (21).

The almost important conclusion regarding ECPR relates to patient selection. Programs offer ECPR must take predefined option criteria for patient groups (e.g., in-hospital cardiac arrests or out-of-hospital cardiac arrests) where extracorporeal technologies are expected to provide an added value to the quality of CPR. Protocols are then developed and operationalized for these groups. Within these patient groups, individual patient option decisions may be hard to make at the actual time of the resucitation and prolonged discussions will waste time. Therefore information technology is necessary that discussions exist held pre-emptively in high chance patients, in lodge to allow balanced decisions to be fabricated to utilise or not use ECMO in the context of a cardiac abort (which is dissimilar than using ECMO for cardiopulmonary failure), and to predefine the type of surgical cannulation that will optimize neurologic and cardiac reperfusion. It is also reasonable not to apply ECMO during resuscitation when it is known—or at least likely—that there volition be no direct do good to the private patient.

Anticipating the hazard for a cardiac abort and appreciating an evolving depression cardiac output state with impaired oxygen commitment requiring escalation of intendance, should trigger the discussion about pre-abort ECMO support, rather than waiting for a cardiac arrest to occur and deploy ECMO during acute CPR. The indications and thresholds for pre-abort ECMO vary between insititutions and within patient populations. More studies are required in this expanse, just nosotros forsee that within the emerging era of Bogus Intelligence and "Big Information," it will be possible to model individual patient take a chance and provide clinicans with boosted data for making decisions (22–25).

Pediatrics

In our establishment and in other like organizations with established extracorporeal life back up (ECLS) programs, there is sufficient data to back up the do good of ECPR in children with cardiac affliction who have an in-infirmary cardiac arrest (come across below) (three, 11, 13, 16, 26–31).

The about recent American Eye Association CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Guidelines that integrate 2010 (in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests) and 2015 (in-hospital cardiac arrests) recommend the following: "ECPR may exist considered for pediatric patients with cardiac diagnoses who have in-infirmary cardiac abort in settings with existing ECMO protocols, expertise, and equipment (Grade IIb, LOE C-LD)." There is notwithstanding, bereft published data to back up the benefit of ECPR over conventional CPR in all pediatric cardiac arrest events (32–35).

In our organization, an individual selection process is applied to children without primary heart disease who take an in-hospital cardiac arrest. This is based on whether the bridging application of extracorporeal technology will aid in supporting a reversible condition and the quality of resuscitation measures (due east.m., refractory hyperkalemic cardiac abort in a child with tumor lysis syndrome), or where the bridging application is part of a predefined care plan (e.1000., cardiac arrest in a child with stop-phase pulmonary arterial hypertension listed for lung transplantation suitable for bridge to transplantion with extracorporeal life support and conventional CPR is non expected to exist constructive) (36).

Pediatric patients with significant illness co-morbidity such equally end organ dysfunction and those with chromosomal abnormalities take the highest risk for mortality during extracorprcorporeal support, and information technology is reasonable for these patients to not receive ECPR in the context of a cardiac arrest result (v, 8). Kane et al reported on the outcomes following ECPR in a large, single-center, retrospective report, and noted that known non-cardiac and chromosomal anomalies were of import factors contributing to agin consequence (OR iii.2, 95% CI ane.three–7.nine). Discussion about the suitability for ECPR should exist possible in the majority of pediatric patients as ECPR is predominantly an in-infirmary and ICU effect. The ELSO 2016 International Report of 1828 pediatric ECPR cases over the period 2011–2015 noted that about of the cardiac arrests supported with ECMO occurred in the Intensive Care Unit of measurement (72%), and but 3% in the emergency department and five% on the ward setting (4).

Pediatrics: Cardiac

Newborns, infants and children after built cardiac surgery have a x-fold college adventure for an in-hospital cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery, and their survival to discharge following the utilise of ECPR has been reported at higher than 50% (13, 31, 37). The Infirmary for Sick Children ECLS Program has offered ECPR since 2000 (38), and since 2009, 148 patients have received ECPR in the Cardiac Disquisitional Care Unit with 54% survival to discharge. Based on local experience, registry data and retrospective studies, patient option is a key factor responsible for improving survival over the years. Successful event is influenced past the type of cardiac disease. Single ventricle patients being at higher gamble for cardiac arrest and with worse outcomes with the apply of ECPR (39). Patients with acute fulminant myocarditis are some of the most suitable candidates for ECPR, as this is often a favorable example of a reversible acquired cardiac status (40, 41).

Performing high quality CPR is essential no affair the indication for ECPR. Information technology is important to appreciate that in some conditions, specifically in patients with congenital center disease, the effectiveness of conventional CPR is limited. New recommendations for the resuscitation of children with heart affliction have been published (42), and in that location are three functional considerations that limit the effectiveness of conventional CPR in children with congenital heart illness.

(i) Express stroke volume with chest compressions, such as from:

a. Atrio-ventricular or semilunar valve regurgitation, or

b. Restrictive myocardium

(two) Limited effective pulmonary blood flow and oxygenation with compressions, such every bit from:

a. Pulmonary outflow obstruction,

b. Elevated pulmonary artery pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance, or

c. Cavo-pulmonary connection

(three) Limited cognitive perfusion, such as from:

(a) Cavo-pulmonary connectedness with elevated superior vena cava pressure, or

(b) Semilunar valve regurgitation or aorto-pulmonary run off across a shunt or collateral vessels

While these circumstances can limit the effectiveness of conventional CPR they may not alone be contraindications for ECPR. There are no specific recommendations in these circumstances to modify the technique for conventional CPR from that recommended for patients with structurally normal hearts. Even so, it is of import these functional considerations are discussed and appreciated before and during resuscitation, and these place even more pressure on ensuring the system for ECPR is optimal for the performance of each of the phases of ECPR described below. In that location is variability in practice betwixt institutions that use ECPR for pediatric patients with heart disease; at that place is a huge opportunity to proceeds knew insights on what protocols and interventions ensure the optimal quality of extracorporeal cerebral-CPR (11).

Given the functional CPR considerations and the importance of the system'south in place, the 2015 Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines (34) and the American Heart Association Scientific Statement include recommendations for children with heart affliction for the setting where ECPR is undertaken (42); specifically: "If cardiac arrest develops in the child with center illness and there is no prompt return of circulation, it is reasonable to initiate ECPR (Grade IIa; Level of Evidence C), and that ECPR can be most effectively deployed in locations with rapid access to ECLS equipment, skilled ECLS personnel, and adequate space to accommodate a large team (Grade IIa, LOE C)."

Adults

The most recent 2015 American Heart Clan CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Guidelines for Adult Avant-garde Life Support (43) target ECPR applications where the technology may permit additional fourth dimension to treat adults with reversible causes of cardiac arrest (e.g., acute coronary artery occlusion, pulmonary embolism, refractory ventricular fibrillation, cardiac injury, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, congestive centre failure, drug intoxications), or serve as a bridge to some other actress-or paracorporeal ventricular assistance device. These recommendations are the following: "There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of ECPR for patients with cardiac arrest. In settings where it can be rapidly implemented, ECPR may be considered for select cardiac arrest patients for whom the suspected etiology of the cardiac arrest is potentially reversible during a limited menstruum of mechanical cardiorespiratory back up. (Class IIb, LOE C-LD)."

In adults, the contemporary literature reports increasingly the deployment of ECPR in both out-of-infirmary and in-hospital cardiac abort. The variability between studies and settings limits estimating the probability of favorable outcome (which ranges from less than 10% to greater than forty%). The populations studied have an arrest that is suspected to be of cardiac origin and where the event is witnessed (26, 44–46). Adult programs reporting improved outcomes have refined patient pick criteria and high performing response systems that may also include coordination with interventional cardiology systems (47–50).

Out-of-Hospital ECPR

The key features of out-of-hospital systems include clear inclusion criteria with rapid protocol-driven emergency systems that either retrieve to cannulate in-hospital or more recently cannulate on-site (49, 51–53). An emergency response team for out-of-infirmary cardiac arrest, which includes a doctor, nurse and paramedic, take reported 156 out-of-infirmary patients who have been placed on ECMO between 2011 and 2015; as they've evolved their selection protocol and grooming, the survival has increased from 3 to 38% which is equivalent to the ELSO Registry for pediatric and newborn patients (54, 55). This is a unique and highly trained and resourced team with outstanding communication systems across a big metropolitan surface area. Such a centralized system with highly trained personnel is beyond the capability of most cities across the world at this fourth dimension only may well be a model for the future. Some are studying such protocols in randomized trials that bundle several resuscitation measures (mechanical CPR devices, hypothermia therapy) with extracorporeal systems (56). While these trial results may non be generalizable to different regional systems, they will exist important for the field.

ECPR: Systems and Resource

In that location are iv singled-out intervals that delineate phases of care when applying ECPR, Figure one. The steps and the elapsing of each phase is disquisitional for a successful outcome. The pathophysiology of the clinical land leading to the abort (earlier time T = 0) may be relevant to individual outcomes but nosotros focus here on the intervals of care relevant to evaluating the system. These include the following:

Interval ane: Interval from start fourth dimension of cardiac arrest (T = 0) to get-go of conventional CPR

Interval 2: Interval from beginning time of CPR to launching the ECPR system

Interval iii: Interval from time of launch of ECPR to achieving return of circulation with adequate flow and perfusion

Interval 4: Interval from time of render of circulation to on-going targeted post-cardiac abort care

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Intervals of resuscitation phases with conventional CPR and ECPR. A cardiac arrest event can be deconstructed in a pre-event interval (Interval −i), and 4 intervals following T = 0, the start of cardiopulmonary abort (CPA). Interval 1 is the interval betwixt the start of cardiopulmonary abort and start of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures, ideally less than 1 min. Interval two starts with the start of conventional CPR which includes C-A-B or A-B-C and if needed early defibrillation. During Interval 2, with ongoing high quality CPR, if there is no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or the likelyhood of ROSC is low or if in that location are functional considerations that limit the effectiveness of conventional CPR, the decision to telephone call for ECPR must be made (5–10 min from T = 0). Interval 3 starts with the launch of ECPR, while ongoing high quality conventional CPR continues. During Interval 3, a group folio is used to deploy the squad, prepare the cannulation location, notify the blood bank, movement the patient in the correct location, position, prepare anatomical site for cannulation, cannulate artery and vein, prepare clear primed circuit. If there is no ROSC with ongoing conventional CPR, ECMO menses is started, pump flows are increased gradually. Interval three stops and Interval 4 starts when target flows are accomplished to return of extracorporeal circulation (ROEC). If ROSC occurs during Interval 3, conventional CPR stops, and the intensive intendance physicians decides if the pharmacological back up is sufficient to continue during the post-cardiac arrest stage, or if VA ECMO cannulation should still continue. A post-event debrief session is conducted after ROC (either in one case sustained ROSC or ROEC). Ideally Intervals 1+2+3 are 30 min or less.

Keys components to minimize ischemia and reperfusion injury include:

(ane) Limiting the Time of No-flow Cardiac Arrest (see Interval 1, Figure 1): Witnessed and in-hospital cardiac arrests offering the all-time conditions where the period of no-flow prior to CPR starting is kept to a minimum to increase the run a risk of myocardial recovery and reducing the risk for ischemic brain injury. It is more than hard to appraise in the out-of-hospital setting, where the effectiveness of bystander CPR is hard to guage. Currently, in our practice at The Hospital for Sick Children, nosotros do non deploy ECPR if the cardiac arrest was un-witnessed and occurs out-of-infirmary. Ideally, Interval 1 is less than 1 min.

(ii) Fantabulous Conventional CPR: (see Intervals 2 and three, Figure 1) this means that the time between cardiac arrest to first resuscitation measures (ABC or CAB) with chest compressions is minimized at < 1 min and that the recommendations for one- or two-person CPR, airway direction, and effectiveness of compressions are closely followed. In the in-hospital setting this will include the improver of continuous monitoring with ECG and plethysmography, continuous end-tidal CO2 monitoring equally an indicator of pulmonary blood flow, and intra-arterial blood force per unit area monitoring when available. Cerebral and somatic well-nigh infrared oximetry (NIRS) may have a part in assessing oxygen delivery during compressions but this yet to be validated. Bilateral cerebral and/or peripheral NIRS are standard monitoring in patients on ECMO in our arrangement to monitor reperfusion and are applied equally soon as viable.

(3) Location, Launching ECPR and Cannulation: ECPR should occur in a well controlled environment in which protocols are in place. This is critical. Fourth dimension is of the essence for ECPR, from the moment of deployment to the start of ECMO flows and return of extracorporeal circulation (ROEC). There can exist a sense of chaos if ECPR is undertaken in an unfamiliar environment, looking for equipment, for admission to medical gases, surgical or technical support, and finding adequate space. All of this must be worked out well in advance and adhred to during deployment of ECPR.

(i) Protocols: Proper institutional or regional protocols include decision pathways or flow diagrams that bespeak the "who, what where" to launch ECPR, and bespeak where the cannulation volition be undertaken and circuit started. Each system should test alternative locations (e.yard., with or without simulation). It many circumstances, it may exist preferable to transport the patient with ongoing CPR to the cannulation location rather than transport the resources (people and equipment) to the patient.

In about pediatric institutions, the equipment needed and personel experienced with ECLS are in the intensive intendance units. It takes unnecessary time to mobilize these resources and cannulate in an unfamiliar environment, such equally the emergency section or inpatient ward or out-patient clinic setting. It takes no less time to proceed effective and monitored CPR on route to the intensive care unit, and indeed may let for faster cannulation times as the equipment and personnel can be mobilized and gear up for immediate cannulation on arrival to the intensive care unit. Institutions will need to evaluate their performance based on their local setting. At The Hospital for Sick Children, in-hospital cardiac arrests that occur in the operating rooms or prototype guided therapy location stay in those areas for cannulation; for whatever other in-hospital cardiac arrest, the patient is transported to the intensive care unit for cannulation.

For adult ECPR applications, where the options for cannulation are wider and are often performed percutaneously, the location for cannulation for an in- or out-of hospital arrest tin can be in the emergency departments, in the interventional catheterization suites, in the operating rooms, and in the intensive intendance units. It is important systems compare processes and outcomes between these options.

Protocols demand to be re-evaluated whenever there is a change to a facility, such equally new construction. Similarly, new hospital designs must include a careful and thoughtful understanding of vital patient safety nets, such as how to brand sure personnel and resources are able to reach patients during urgent events like cardiac arrest, and facilitate expeditious transfer of patients to resources such as ECPR. These are clinical decisions and they must be made by clinical teams rather than being asked or expected to adjust to constraints placed by new building design.

(2) Equipment: The cannulation equipment for ECMO must be bachelor, in prepared packages (bundled) and consistent; it is a waste of fourth dimension to transport staff off to find specific and often unnecessary instruments. Different approaches may exist used to cannulate for veno-arterial ECMO during CPR (east.chiliad., peripheral or open chest; open surgical, percutaneous, combination). These may non provide similar cerebral and myocardial reperfusion or may not exist achieved by the same individuals (surgeons vs. non-surgeons), merely most institutions will pre-ascertain a express set of default cannulation approaches in club to optimize speed, operation and minimize complications. Equally examples: a patient with recent sternotomy subsequently cardiac surgery will be cannulated relatively faster by reopening the chest rather than via a peripheral cannulation site, but the tradeoff may be suspension to cardiac compressions during cannulation. Medical patients less than 10–15 kg will be more rapidly cannulated via the carotid and jugular right neck approaches while a fifty kg adolescent may exist cannulated faster via femoral artery and vein on the side optimal to the operator. Therefore, when deciding where to launch ECPR, surgical requirements for cannulation are essential to consider; and these are procedures that should be performed in conditions as close as possible to that of the operating room.

The gear up and initiation of the ECMO circuit should exist identical each time, and should merely vary according to the size of the patient. The selection of arterial and venous cannulae is based on size and blood menses targets. The electric current use of centrifugal pumps and membranes with depression circuit volumes means that the circuit tin can exist clear-primed and gear up to deploy within 10–15 min and therefore should not be a limitation to establishing flows. The circuit tin can be prepare upwardly abroad from the bedside and brought frontward one time cannulae have been placed. There should not be whatever delay in establishing catamenia and perfusion past waiting for blood to become available; a clear crystalloid prime number is probable to be used in most circumstances. An exchange transfusion can occur one time on ECMO support to elevate the hematocrit to the desired level (35 to twoscore%) with type-matched blood. Some pediatric centers titrate the FiO2 in the ECMO circuit and use temperature targeted therapy of 34°C (hypothermia) or normothermia; yet there is no comparative data suggesting i is superior to the other.

Personnel Experienced in ECLS

Important in any setting, proper protocols ensure that multiple roles, responsibilities, and tasks are concurrently being completed, and these should not exist improvised. We include in Figure ane an instance of the multiple streams of deportment that need to be completed concurrently. This is probably the almost important component for whatever ECPR deployment. Leadership, orchestration and role consignment are key.

(i) Determination to phone call. The decision to call and launch ECPR should be made as early every bit possible, ideally within the start two rounds of resuscitation medicines having been administered. Some systems will utilise clock time and in our organization, nosotros expect the physician to make the conclusion to call within 5-10 min. There needs to be clear lines of authority for calling for ECPR and this should be part of the agreed upon protocol established by the team before implementing an ECPR plan. Indecision will lead to unnecessary delays in deployment as well the potential for unnecessary conflict and incertitude. It is easier to call off deployment if there is spontaneous recovery of the circulation rather than delaying a definitive decision. At The Hospital for Sick Children, the intensive care doctor will make the determination to telephone call for ECPR on nigh occasions. If a cardiac abort occurs in the operating room or during a cardiac interventional procedure, than the cardiac surgeon or the staff cardiologist or cardiac anesthesiologist will accept responsibility for launching ECPR.

(2) Whom to telephone call. It is essential a robust fan-out list is established to make sure the right people are notified for ECPR (End of Interval 2 and first of Interval 3, Effigy 1). This fan-out could be either past group page or conversation group application. The list should include the surgeons who will be cannulating and ECMO specialists/perfusion specialists, and include data about the cannulation location and size of patient.

(iii) Availability. A concern raised for ECPR is the availability of cannulating physicians (due east.thousand., surgeons) and ECMO specialists or perfusion specialists peculiarly out of hours. This should not exist a limiting step, and role of the ECPR implementation is to make certain that in-house staff and teams are trained to start to prepare the patient for cannulation. During this time, information technology is essential that effective CPR go on and exist closely monitored. Equally to the availability of ECMO specialists or perfusionist to prime and manage the circuit, ideally, there should be in-house trained staff to do this 24/7. It is upwardly to the individual programs every bit to how this is achieved and who is trained for this part, but any arroyo is taken, it must be consistent with regular training and simulation. This is particularly disquisitional for programs that may have <five–10 ECPR launches per twelvemonth.

(four) Role consignment. There should be no confusion regarding assigned roles for staff during ECPR. Initial measures already involves assigned roles and responsibilities with a resuscitation leader. In improver, added roles and responsibilities are required for the ECMO deloyment, and parallel concurrent tasks need to be accomplished. An effective system will contain:

(a) An "Inner" manager who coordinates ongoing resuscitation and CPR throughout cannulation.

(b) An "Outer" manager who tin orchestrate all of the back up, equipment for the performing cannulation, and very important, control the inevitable oversupply, dissonance and traffic (NB, the ELSO Specialist Manual and Redbook provides several examples) (57). All staff should know their role and empathise their fix of responsibilities to avoid loss of time, confusions, and wasted time on duplicating tasks.

(c) Communication must be straight and closed-loop; if anybody sees a discrepancy or problem, they must experience safe and compelled to speak upwards. This tin only come with regular multidisciplinary and structured squad training and simulation.

Duration of Resuscitation Measures Before Achieving Return of Circulation

In the ELSO 2016 International Report, the median duration of ECPR was 40 min (IQR 25, 61 min). Reduced survival for ECPR was associated with lower postal service-ECMO arterial pH, higher lactate, and end organ injury, and this could reverberate the underlying disease and functional land that limits constructive CPR, but could too reflect the time it took to cannulate and achieve adequate flows on ECMO. While it is true that survival has been reported later >fifty min of ECPR, experienced centers with a well-designed and trained in-firm teams are able to reduce the ECPR time to <30 min.

A longer duration of ECPR is associated with adverse neurologic event. Lasa et al reported on ECPR during in-infirmary cardiac resuscitation from the American Heart Association's (AHA) Get with the Guidelines Resuscitation Registry. For children with in-infirmary CPR > 10 min duration, ECPR was associated with improved survival to hospital belch (OR 2.fourscore, 95% CI 2.thirteen–three.69) and survival with favorable neurologic outcome (OR two.64, 95% CI 1.91–3.64) when compared to conventional resuscitation. In our organization, we aim to achieve render of apportionment (ROC) past 30 min either by spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and conventional CPR or past return of extracorporeal circulation (ROEC) with ECPR; we use this as a performance measure to benchmark the processes applied during resuscitation and ECPR launches. This thirty min is not used to stop resuscitation measures just is used to evaluate lag times for each phase and determine what could have contributed to delays in achieving ROC (due east.g., steps completed early on during interval 2 such as defibrillation or airway control vs steps completed during interval 3 similar vessel cannulation).

Decisions to stop resuscitation or end attempts at ECPR can be challenging for the dr. who does non apply these decisions oft. Programs that offer ECPR must exist able to stop resuscitation measures and transition to palliative care or continue intensive intendance with or without advanced technologies. At The Hospital for Sick Children, while cardiac surgeons or the staff cardiologists or cardiac anesthesiologists tin can launch the deployment of ECPR outside of the intensive intendance units, the intensive care physicians are paged with the ECPR team launch and are expected to lead or facilitate the determination making process when stopping measures are reasonable. Providing palliative intendance following the launch of advanced technologies happens oft during the mail-abort care, and is part of the comprehensive intendance due to these patients and their families.

Post-Cardiac Abort Care With ECPR Direction

A notable finding in the recent ELSO report was that therapeutic hypothermia was used later nearly 60% of ECPR events (iv). While the THAPCA trial indicates that in that location is no additional benefit for targeted temperature command with hypothermia subsequently a cardiac arrest over normothermia (58, 59) in that location is no data yet for the do good or gamble of hypothermia induced during the resuscitation or ECPR. Our practice since 2000 has been to initiate ECPR at 34°C and either maintain targeted temperature at 34°C or rewarm at 36–37.5°C based on the private patient characteristics.

The target flow rate and perfusion pressure level should be discussed once ECMO flow has been established and this will vary according to the diagnosis and age of the patient. Cognitive and myocardial reperfusion may be associated with altered cerebral autoregulation and myocardial stunning. Hence, careful attention is required to maintain an adequate cerebral perfusion. The ECMO specialist are trained to carefully increase circuit blood flow to target perfusion pressures, and to carefully titrate gas flow to avoid hypocapnia and hypercapnia, all in an try to minimize secondary ischemia. Because of the risk for complimentary Oii radical germination, we employ an ECMO system that allows titration of FdO2 (diffusion of oxygen) in the ECMO membrane to be equally low as possible to maintain a mail service membrane arterial PO2 above 100–150 mmHg and decrease the FiOtwo through the mechanical ventilator to room air (or as depression) as possible when ECMO flows are initiated. Monitoring with NIRS and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography may be benign in this regard.

Once ECMO flow has been established, critical questions well-nigh myocardial recovery volition need to be addressed. Information technology is mutual for the myocardium to accept electrical activity but with limited ejection after ECPR, and it can take up to 48 h to recover constructive ejection and pulse width on the arterial waveform. It is vital that the heart not exist over distended as this will cause further myocardial injury from the elevated wall stress. The assessment of need for decompression of the left ventricle, either transcatheter or surgical, tin be made clinically at the bedside and with echocardiography.

ECPR involves the exposure to anticoagulation. The take chances of intracranial hemorrhage in ECPR is higher than in patients back up with ECMO. Nosotros speculate that multiple factors may be responsible for this difference (e.g., altered neurovascular unit, anticoagulation practices, cannulation strategies, microemboli, inflammation), merely more than piece of work is needed to understand what factors are modifiable. Systems using ECPR should have the capacities to provide neuroimaging and neurologic assessments (including electrophysiology, clinical, monitoring) either during and post-obit separation from extracorporeal technologies. A detailed review of the neurologic and functional assessment is across the telescopic on this specific paper, but should be aligned with other post-arrest care guidelines by resuscitation councils for pediatric or adults.

Reliability and Resilience

A reliable program is able to consistently answer in a well structured and efficient manner to the need at hand. A resilient program is able to adjust to uncertain circumstances when necessary, and recover from unexpected events. Both of these should be charcteristics of a well-performance ECPR program. To achieve this requires practice, briefing and debriefing, and commitment of individuals and the team as a whole.

Getting Started

Starting a programme can be daunting. The first step is to reach buy-in at a senior administrative level that an ECPR programme is a requirement, a fundemental safety cyberspace for select patient populations. Given the wealth of information available, there should be no demand to prove "value," nor to present data around a "render on investment." Nosotros acknowledge that the equipment, resourses and training are expensive, but the value is in lives saved and in the fundemental support required to develop a contemporary resuscitation program, particularly in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

The next step is to identify key stakeholders and their contributions to the ECPR program. Leaders should be chosen who have the responsibleness and authority to directly all phases of the plan. At a minimum this includes the surgeons who volition perform the cannulation, critical care clinicians and perfusion or ECPR specialists who volition manage the excursion. Settling on equipment and resource to provide ECPR is the next footstep. It may take 6 months to be prepared, and it is highly recommended that new progams contact and partner with established programs to assist navigate all the steps required to constitute an ECPR program. These partnerships are critical for sharing information and ideas, and for benchmarking outcomes. In addition, joininig established registries, such as the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, or the American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines for Reuscitation are recommended every bit these volition also provide important benchmarks against which to measure success.

Maintaining an ECPR Program

The key to maintaining a successful program are consistent cycles of measurement, review and training. Simulation training is particularly important to assess skills, trouble-shoot potential problems and complications that can occur during resuscitation, cannulation and with the excursion, and to ensure the squad is well trained with advisable role assignments to optimize operation. Ideally these should be performed in situ, i.e., embedded within the clinical environment. The frequency of simulation will vary according to the number of ECPR events managed by the team, however, when events are exceptional, we recommend at least monthly imitation ECPR preparation.

The review process should include the following components:

(i) Hot debrief immediately later ECPR has been deployed to assess acute concerns or problems, and in particular, to acknowledge what went well.

(2) ECLS daily rounds are important to appraise the day to day management of the excursion and trajectory of the patient

(3) ECLS monthly meeting are necessary to evaluate all aspects of the care provided and assess where improvements may be needed. These meetings should exist structured with data measuring concerns for cannulation and complications with the excursion, anticaogulation, and patient-related complications including neurologic injury.

Involving Parents

A primal role during whatever ECPR upshot is to faciliate information to the parents or care-givers of the patient. While the team has to focus on the phases of resuscitation and ECPR every bit described above, it tin can be very upsetting for parents to witness these events, or worse, not have information conveyed to them. Therefore, asigning an experienced individual to exist with the parents and explain what is beingness done to their child is a priority. Every bit to whether or non parents are nowadays throughout depends on the squad and the instiutional policies in this regard. In our experience we try to ensure parents are present during the stage 1 and 2, but once the surgical procedure starts and the equipment builds upwards in the confined infinite of our unit of measurement, we ordinarily ask the parents wait exterior of the area, and at the same time make sure there is ongoing line of communication with them during the procedure.

Concluding Comment

The utility of ECPR has been demonstrated in single center and registry retrospective studies, but as is often pointed out and concluded in diverse studies and reviews, at that place accept been no randomized trials performed to definitively bear witness the do good of ECPR over conventional CPR. The recommendations for ECPR have been couched in impartial terms such as "consider" or "information technology is reasonable"; there may exist benefit, but no definitive recommendations.

It is our view from over 40 years of combined experience, that the existing data in a subset of children afterwards built heart surgery and in children with reversible heart disease such every bit acute fulminant myocarditis, conclusively supports the notion of a arrangement for ECPR as a requirement for whatsoever program undertaking pediatric cardiac surgery. This existence the case, then the systems and people must be in place for effective resuscitation and timely implementation of ECPR, follow up of the patients and their families, no matter the size of the plan.

Author Contributions

PL and A-MG shared equal contributions to the grooming of this manuscript, including review of relevant literature and citations, development and writing of content, and the opinions expressed within.

Funding

Work for this manuscript was funded in function through the David and Stacey Cynamon endowed Chair in Pediatric Disquisitional Care Medicine at the Hospital for Ill children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Conflict of Involvement Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could exist construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

one. Belohlavek J, Chen Y-S, Morimura N. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. In: Brogan TV, Lequier L, Lorusso R, MacLaren G, Peek Chiliad, editors. ELSO RedBook. Ann Arbor, MI: Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (2017). p. 501–xvi.

two. Abdul-Khaliq H, Uhlig R, Bottcher W, Ewert P, Alexi-Meskishvili Five, Lange PE. Factors influencing the change in cerebral hemodynamics in pediatric patients during and after corrective cardiac surgery of congenital heart diseases by means of full-flow cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion (2002) 17:179–85. doi: x.1191/0267659102pf563oa

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

iii. Aubin H, Petrov M, Dalyanoglu H, Richter M, Saeed D, Akhyari P, et al. 4-twelvemonth experience of providing mobile extracorporeal life support to out-of-center patients within a suprainstitutional network-Outcome of 160 consecutively treated patients. Resuscitation (2017) 121:151–vii. doi: x.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS, Raman L, Ryerson LM, Alexander P, et al. Pediatric extracorporeal life back up organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. (2017) 63:456–63. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000603

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Brunner A, Dubois North, Rimensberger PC, Karam O. Identifying prognostic criteria for survival subsequently resuscitation assisted past extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Res Pract. (2016) 2016:9521091. doi: x.1155/2016/9521091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dennis Thousand, McCanny P, D'Souza M, Forrest P, Burns B, Lowe DA, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac abort: a multicentre experience. Int J Cardiol. (2017) 231:131–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kane DA, Thiagarajan RR, Wypij D, Scheurer MA, Fynn-Thompson F, Emani S, et al. Rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children with cardiac disease. Circulation (2010) 122(11 Suppl.): S241–8. doi: ten.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ix. Kilbaugh TJ, Srinivasan 5, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM. Propensity, prophecy, and perplexity: does in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation really make a difference? Resuscitation (2010) 81:786–vii. doi: ten.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

10. de Chambrun MP, Brechot N, Lebreton G, Schmidt M, Hekimian G, Demondion P, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic daze post-cardiac abort. Intensive Intendance Med. (2016) 42:1999–2007. doi: x.1007/s00134-016-4541-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lasa JJ, Jain P, Raymond TT, Minard CG, Topjian A, Nadkarni V, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pediatric cardiac population: in search of a standard of care. Pediatr Crit Intendance Med. (2017) 19:125–xxx. doi: x.1097/PCC.0000000000001388

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

12. Chang FL, Chang WC, Cheng YT, Liu TJ, Lee WL, Lai CH. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection causing acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest in a 25-year-old male. Perfusion (2017) 33:160–3. doi: 10.1177/0267659117727824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

13. Lowry AW, Morales DL, Graves DE, Knudson JD, Shamszad P, Mott AR, et al. Characterization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric cardiac arrest in the United States: assay of the kids' inpatient database. Pediatr Cardiol. (2013) 34:1422–thirty. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0666-8

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

fourteen. Lyon RJ. Actress-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation - miracle cure or expensive futility? Resuscitation (2012) 83:1311–2. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

15. Pabst D, El-Banayosy A, Soleimani B, Brehm CE. Predictors of survival for nonhighly selected patients undergoing resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac abort. ASAIO J. (2017) 64:368–74. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

xvi. Richardson As, Schmidt Chiliad, Bailey M, Pellegrino VA, Rycus PT, Pilcher DV. ECMO Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR), trends in survival from an international multicentre cohort written report over 12-years. Resuscitation (2017) 112:34–forty. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Clark AE, Moler F, Meert 1000, Harrison RE, et al. Incidence and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in PICUs. Crit Intendance Med. (2016) 44:798–808. doi: x.1097/CCM.0000000000001484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chang JJ, Lin MS, Chen TH, Chen DY, Chen SW, Hsu JT, et al. Eye failure and mortality of adult survivors from acute myocarditis requiring intensive care treatment - a nationwide accomplice report. Int J Med Sci. (2017) xiv:1241–fifty. doi: 10.7150/ijms.20618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Safar P. Cognitive resuscitation from temporary consummate global brain ischemia. In: Cerebral Blood Menses Mechanisms of Ischemia, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Pinksy CM, Vincent JL, editors. Berlin: Springer (2002).

Google Scholar

20. Jimenez-Galanes Due south, Meneu-Diaz MJ, Elola-Olaso AM, Perez-Saborido B, Yiliam FS, Calvo AG, et al. Liver transplantation using uncontrolled non-middle-beating donors under normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Liver Transpl. (2009) fifteen:1110–8. doi: x.1002/lt.21867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kennedy CE, Turley JP. Time serial assay as input for clinical predictive modeling: modeling cardiac abort in a pediatric ICU. Theor Biol Med Model. (2011) eight:forty. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-eight-40

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Potes C, Conroy B, Xu-Wilson M, Newth C, Inwald D, Frassica J. A clinical prediction model to identify patients at high risk of hemodynamic instability in the pediatric intensive care unit. Critical Intendance (2017) 21:282. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1874-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Vu EL, Rusin CG, Penny DJ, Kibler KK, Easley RB, Smith B, et al. A novel electrocardiogram algorithm utilizing ST-segment instability for detection of cardiopulmonary arrest in single ventricle physiology: a retrospective study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2017) xviii:44–53. doi: x.1097/PCC.0000000000000980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Abdeen MS, Albert A, Maxhera B, Hoffmann T, Petrov G, Sixt Southward, et al. Implanting permanent left ventricular assistance devices in patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: practise we actually demand a cardiopulmonary bypass machine? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2016) 50:542–seven. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Girotra Due south, Spertus JA, Li Y, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Chan PS, et al. Survival trends in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests: an analysis from get with the guidelines-resuscitation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes (2013) 6:42–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967968

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gupta P, Jacobs JP, Pasquali SK, Colina KD, Gaynor JW, O'Brien SM, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest later on pediatric cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. (2014) 98:2138–43; word: 2144. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Gupta P, Tang X, Gall CM, Lauer C, Rice TB, Wetzel RC. Epidemiology and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in critically ill children across hospitals of varied heart volume: a multi-heart assay. Resuscitation (2014) 85:1473–9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Gupta P, Yan Thou, Chow V, Dao DT, Gossett JM, Leong Grand, et al. Variability of characteristics and outcomes following cardiopulmonary resuscitation events in diverse ICU settings in a single, 3rd intendance children'due south hospital*. Pediatr Crit Intendance Med. (2014) fifteen:e128-41. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

31. Lasa JJ, Rogers RS, Localio R, Shults J, Raymond T, Gaies M, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) during pediatric in-infirmary cardiopulmonary arrest is associated with improved survival to discharge: a study from the american heart association's become with the guidelines-resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry. Circulation (2016) 133:165–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Samson RA, Hazinski MF, Atkins DL, et al. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Middle Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation (2010) 122(xviii Suppl. iii):S876–908. doi: x.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971101

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

33. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, Atkins DL, Berg RA, Berg MD, et al. Part 10: pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Scientific discipline With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation (2010) 122(sixteen Suppl. 2):S466–515. doi: ten.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. de Caen AR, Maconochie IK, Aickin R, Atkins DL, Biarent D, Guerguerian AM, et al. Part 6: pediatric basic life support and pediatric avant-garde life support 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular intendance science with handling recommendations. Apportionment (2015) 132:S177–203. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text

35. Pediatric basic life support and pediatric avant-garde life support: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care scientific discipline with treatment recommendations. Circulation (2016) 134:e121.

36. Strueber M, Hoeper MM, Fischer Southward, Cypel M, Warnecke G, Gottlieb J, et al. Bridge to thoracic organ transplantation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension using a pumpless lung assist device. Am J Transplant. (2009) 9:853–7. doi: x.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02549.ten

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Knudson JD, Neish SR, Cabrera AG, Lowry AW, Shamszad P, Morales DL, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of pediatric in-infirmary cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States: an assay of the Kids' Inpatient Database*. Crit Care Med. (2012) twoscore:2940–4. doi: x.1097/CCM.0b013e31825feb3f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Alsoufi B, Al-Radi OO, Nazer RI, Gruenwald C, Foreman C, Williams WG, et al. Survival outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric patients with refractory cardiac arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2007) 134:952–ix.e2. doi: x.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lowry AW. Resuscitation and perioperative direction of the loftier-run a risk single ventricle patient: first-stage palliation. Congenit Heart Dis. (2012) 7:466–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00710.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

xl. Duncan BW, Bohn DJ, Atz AM, French JW, Laussen PC, Wessel DL. Mechanical circulatory back up for the handling of children with acute fulminant myocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2001) 122:440–8. doi: x.1067/mtc.2001.115243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Teele SA, Allan CK, Laussen PC, Newburger JW, Gauvreau Grand, and Thiagarajan RR. Management and outcomes in pediatric patients presenting with acute fulminant myocarditis. J Pediatr. (2011) 158:638–43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.10.015

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

42. Marino BS, Tabbutt S, MacLaren G, Hazinski MF, Adatia I, Atkins DL, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infants and children with cardiac affliction: a scientific statement from the american heart clan. Circulation (2018). doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000524. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, et al. Part vii: adult avant-garde cardiovascular life support: 2015 american heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular intendance. Circulation (2015) 132(18 Suppl. 2):S444–64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Shin TG, Choi JH, Jo IJ, Sim MS, Song HG, Jeong YK, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with inhospital cardiac arrest: a comparison with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. (2011) 39:1–vii. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Chen YS, Yu HY, Huang SC, Lin JW, Chi NH, Wang CH, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation back up can extend the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. (2008) 36:2529–35. doi: x.1097/CCM.0b013e318183f491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Maekawa K, Tanno K, Hase M, Mori K, Asai Y. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin: a propensity-matched study and predictor assay. Crit Care Med. (2013) 41:1186–96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca4c8

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Raveendran G, Conterato Thou, Frascone RJ, Trembley A, et al. Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 70:1109–17. doi: ten.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wang CH, Chou NK, Becker LB, Lin JW, Yu HY, Chi NH, et al. Improved outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac abort–a comparison with that for extracorporeal rescue for in-hospital cardiac abort. Resuscitation (2014) 85:1219–24. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.022

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Stub D, Bernard Due south, Pellegrino V, Smith K, Walker T, Sheldrake J, et al. Refractory cardiac arrest treated with mechanical CPR, hypothermia, ECMO and early reperfusion (the CHEER trial). Resuscitation (2015) 86:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Younger JG, Schreiner RJ, Swaniker F, Hirschl RB, Chapman RA, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal resuscitation of cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med. (1999) 6:700–vii. doi: x.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00438.x

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Chou TH, Fang CC, Yen ZS, Lee CC, Chen YS, Ko WJ, et al. An observational study of extracorporeal CPR for in-infirmary cardiac arrest secondary to myocardial infarction. Emerg Med J. (2014) 31:441–7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Sakamoto T, Morimura Due north, Nagao K, Asai Y, Yokota H, Nara S, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study. Resuscitation (2014) 85:762–8. doi: x.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

53. Sawamoto G, Bird SB, Katayama Y, Maekawa G, Uemura S, Tanno K, et al. Event from severe accidental hypothermia with cardiac arrest resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. (2014) 32:320–4. doi: x.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

54. Lamhaut L, Hutin A, Deutsch J, Raphalen JH, Jouffroy R, Orsini JP, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the prehospital setting: an illustrative case of ECPR performed in the louvre museum. Prehosp Emerg Care (2017) 21:386–nine. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1263372

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

55. Lamhaut 50, Hutin A, Puymirat E, Jouan J, Raphalen JH, Jouffroy R, et al. A Pre-Infirmary Extracorporeal Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) strategy for treatment of refractory out infirmary cardiac abort: An observational study and propensity assay. Resuscitation (2017) 117:109–17. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Belohlavek J, Kucera One thousand, Jarkovsky J, Franek O, Pokorna Thou, Danda J, et al. Hyperinvasive approach to out-of hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical breast compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal life back up and early invasive cess compared to standard of care. A randomized parallel groups comparative study proposal. "Prague OHCA study". J Transl Medi. (2012) 10: 163–three. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-163

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

57. Thiagarajan R, Brediger S, Larsen South, Flynn-Thompson F, Alexander P. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children. In: Brogan Goggle box, Lequier L, Lorusso R, MacLaren 1000, Peek G, editors. ELSO Red Book. Ann Arbor, MI: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (2017). p. 321–30.

Google Scholar

58. Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, Slomine BS, Christensen JR, Nadkarni VM, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia later on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children. Due north Engl J Med. (2015) 372:1898–908. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, Slomine BS, Christensen JR, Nadkarni VM, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia afterward in-hospital cardiac arrest in children. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:318–29. doi: ten.1056/NEJMoa1610493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

grubbsprowenties.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2018.00152/full

Post a Comment for "The Inefficiency of the Ecpr Yet Again"